Creationism after Recess?! God Help Us All...

Sunday, April 18, 2010 by TG

The only thing creationism accomplishes is destruction.

Every 10 years, the Texas Board of Education votes on how to change the state’s school curriculum. The Texas Board of Education is comprised of 15 elected members, and as you could have probably guessed, the vast majority of them are right-wing Christians. Among the many propositions that were voted on, one was the addition of creationism into Texas’s public school curriculum. Creationism is the literal belief in the account of creation given in the Book of Genesis. Creationism denies the theory of the evolution of species. The teaching of creationism in public schools is wrong on many levels.

Firstly, the “theory” of creationism is scientifically incorrect. Countless scientific errors can be drawn from Genesis (not to mention the bible in general), which can be understood due to the advancement of scientific discovery since the bible was created. Lets observe a few scientifically unsatisfactory concepts from Genesis. Genesis states that God created light 3 days before the sun and the stars. This is impossible because daylight is caused by the energy emissions from the sun (a star). The bible also states that earth was created before the stars. This is incorrect because earth is billions of years younger than many stars. While earth is scientifically concluded to be about 4.7 billion years old, astrologists have discovered light from many stars that have been analyzed to be up to 14 billion years old. The bible also states that the earth was created in 6 days and humans and animals in less than 1 day, whereas science concludes that the earth and all life has evolved over billions of years. Regardless of the innumerable additional scientific inconsistencies that can be found in Genesis, teaching creationism in schools is not only intellectually harmful, but it is also psychologically damaging.

By teaching developing minds to accept the literal interpretation of the bible, students will be damaged mentally and emotionally. First, students will learn to accept ideas despite the lack of any factual backing, which will handicap their intellectual ability. Many will get the idea that solely because many other people believe something, regardless of how fallacious it is, it must be true. Next, students will get the impression that if some parts of the bible should be literally interpreted, then why shouldn’t others be? The bible also states that homosexuals, fortunetellers, people who don’t listen to priests, people who hit their father, non-believers, followers of other religions, people who work on the Sabbath, and many more innocent people must be killed, so why shouldn't this also be taken literally? Also, the bible commands many acts of self-sacrifice necessary in order to go to heaven after death. By obeying the literal messages of the bible, it may force the individual to live life in a way that he or she does not want, in hopes to enjoy an unproven and unrealistic afterlife instead of enjoying reality in whichever way makes the person happy.

Despite all of the harmful effects of teaching creationism, these are not the underlying factors of why creationism should not be taught in public schools. Anyone who wishes to accept, teach, or learn about creationism should be able to -- if someone wants to be self-destructive, they should be able to do so as long as it does not impose physical harm onto anyone else. One should not have his or her money forcefully taken and given toward something that he or she does not want. Texas is proposing to use the money forcefully taken from all Texas residents and to use it toward teaching creationism, which is wrong as it forces a number of individuals to spend their money toward something against their wishes. As Thomas Jefferson agrees, the foundation of individual rights and the key to a successful nation is "the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."

Marijiana in the Ballot

Friday, April 2, 2010 by TG

Legalize it!

The organizers of the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010 have now collected enough signatures in order for the legalization of marijuana to be placed on the 2010 California ballot along with the choice with the state’s governor. The use of marijuana, and in fact all drugs should be legal, as the benefits are outmatched.

Firstly, legalizing drugs would make communities safer. It was reported in “Heroin: The Shocking Story” that drugs are connected to 40% of all crimes, and in Wharton Econometrics for the US Customs Service that police blame drugs for 25% of car thefts, 40% of robberies and assaults, and 50% of burglaries and thefts. When such an addictively demanded product is very expensive, cravings and fixes make individuals steal and ignore rational judgment, which accounts for a large portion of the percentages listed above. After the sale and use of drugs would be decriminalized, the price would fall dramatically due to the law of supply and demand (supply increases, price falls). When the price massively decreases, people will not have to go through such drastic measures to purchase the drugs they want; they will no longer have to steal to satisfy their habits. A study done by Lester P. Silverman, a former associate director for the National Academy of Sciences’ Assembly of Behavior and Social Sciences, shows the clear correlation between drug price and crime rates: a 10 percent increase in the price of heroin caused a 3.1 percent increase in property crimes, armed robbery by 6.4 percent, and simple assault by 5.6 percent in a nonwhite neighborhood in Detroit.

Another way that legalizing drugs could make our communities safer is that it would improve our police. Currently, studies show that from 33% to 50% of all police resources are used for drug activity and drug related crimes. If drugs were legalized, this huge amount of these resources would be freed to put to use towards other more imperative crimes.

Legalizing drugs could also sharply decrease organized crime. If drugs were to be legalized, the legal market would acquire most of the customers from the black market, as their products would be much more trusted, have higher quality, and be cheaper. Profit margins would decrease for gangs to the point that their power and threat would decrease immensely.

The legalization of drugs would make the product much safer than if it’s sale was left to the black market. Currently, most drugs go through multiple sources, which the buyer usually knows nothing about. These sources often lace and tamper with the drugs. Also, many drugs like heroin and cocaine are diluted with substances, which are unknown to the consumer and can be very harmful, and even deadly. If drugs were legalized, due to the free market, consumers would purchase the products from a reliable source. If you were to purchase any product, would you rather buy a name brand from a grocery store or from a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy who gets it from a cousin internationally?

I can go on, explaining many more of different beneficial impacts of the legalization of drugs from the reduction of prison overcrowding to the reduction of the spread of AIDS, but these are only side effects to the main reason why all drugs should be legal: every individual should have the right to do what he or she wishes with his or her own body.


**Statistics from bmstahoe.com